Planetology

Pluto, Ceres, and Eris

Three dwarf planets, three kinds of impact, and atmospheres too thin to warm the ice.

From the pair notes by Lucas Noury and Andrew Davis. Pluto, Ceres, and Eris are kept together as the dwarf-planet set.

Pluto

Region
Kuiper belt
Air
Thin nitrogen
Moon
Charon, kiss-and-capture
Seen by
New Horizons

Ceres

Region
Asteroid belt
Air
Temporary water vapor
Surface
Cratered
Seen by
Dawn

Eris

Region
Kuiper belt, farther out
Air
None detected
Moon
Dysnomia, from an impact
Distance
~70% farther than Pluto at the far end

Highlight one body. The other two stay on the page.

Question 1

Formation pathway

All three formed by accumulation of smaller rocky or icy bodies. Radioactive heat differentiated the interiors. None gained enough mass to clear its orbit, which is why the notes keep them as dwarf planets rather than planets. Pluto and Eris grew in the Kuiper belt. Ceres grew in the asteroid belt, between Mars and Jupiter.

Pluto

The core is tied, in the notes, to the same era that built comets, moons, and other rocky bodies. Gas and ice were pulled in later. Pluto never gathered enough mass to become a full-size planet or to clear its orbit.

Ceres

Gradual accumulation of smaller rocky bodies where dust and gas were plentiful, between Mars and Jupiter. Radioactive decay heated the interior and layered it. Ceres could not clear that orbit or merge into a larger body.

Eris

Accumulation of smaller icy bodies in a dense part of the outer system. At its farthest it sits about 70% farther out than Pluto. Radiogenic heat drove differentiation. Under a nitrogen and methane surface is a convective ice shell. Eris and Dysnomia are tidally locked to each other, a doubly synchronous pair.

Evidence. The shared key point in the notes: accumulation, radioactive heating, and not enough mass to clear an orbit. Eris’s “about 70% farther” is their distance comparison, at the far end of the orbit.

Question 2

Collisions and captures

Pluto’s headline is Charon. In Denton’s kiss-and-capture model, Pluto and Charon hit about 4.5 billion years ago, stuck for 10 to 15 hours, and then separated into orbit instead of destroying each other. The heat of that collision is their explanation for Pluto’s active geology. Ceres’s record is a cratered surface, with bodies about 10 km across hitting on the order of once every 10 million years. Eris’s moon Dysnomia formed when a body hundreds of kilometers across hit Eris and the debris went into orbit.

Pluto and Charon

Kiss-and-capture. They collided and did not destroy each other. Stuck for 10 to 15 hours, then slowly separated, still trapped in orbit. New Horizons imaged Charon.

Ceres

Many smaller hits, not one moon-making impact. A cratered surface. Bodies about 10 km across, about once every 10 million years. Dawn imaged Ceres.

Eris and Dysnomia

One giant impact. A body hundreds of kilometers across. Debris ejected into orbit became Dysnomia.

Evidence. Charon at about 4.5 billion years, a 10 to 15 hour contact, then separation. Ceres cratering rate as stated. Dysnomia from an impact of a body hundreds of kilometers across. New Horizons for Pluto and Charon. Dawn for Ceres.

Still open. Kiss-and-capture is presented as a common theory, Denton’s model, not as a settled reconstruction. The comparison slide in the notes says 10 to 14 hours. The Charon slide says 10 to 15. Both are “about half a day.”

Question 3

Volatiles and air

Pluto’s atmosphere is very thin and almost entirely molecular nitrogen, with traces of methane and carbon monoxide. The 9 June 1988 stellar occultation, seen from eight sites, measured the scale height. Nitrogen, methane, and carbon monoxide ice can sublimate. Ceres has a very thin temporary exosphere, thought to be mostly water vapor vented by internal heat. Water ice sublimates there. Eris has no atmosphere that current measurements can detect. If one exists, it is extremely thin, forms near the far end of the orbit, and then the gas collapses and freezes onto the surface as snow. Methane ice sublimates on Eris. None of the three atmospheres is thick enough to warm the surface.

Pluto

Nitrogen, plus methane and carbon monoxide. Thin enough that starlight during the 1988 occultation could size it. Ices sublimate.

Ceres

A temporary exosphere, mostly water vapor, tied to venting. Water ice sublimates. Not a permanent air.

Eris

Nothing detected. Any air would form near apogee and then snow back onto a nitrogen and methane surface.

Evidence. Pluto’s composition from the notes’ detailed atmosphere slide: molecular nitrogen, methane, carbon monoxide. The 9 June 1988 occultation. Ceres water vapor. Eris undetected. The comparison slide once says carbon dioxide for Pluto. The detailed slide says carbon monoxide. This page follows the detailed slide.

Still open. Eris’s atmosphere is “if it has one.” Ceres’s exosphere is “believed” and temporary. Pluto’s air is the one with a direct occultation measurement in these notes.

Question 4

A constrained future

As the Sun expands it loses mass, and the orbits expand. Ceres, much closer than the other two, faces a different heat. Surface ice sublimates and near-surface water evaporates. Pluto is expected to remain an icy dwarf for billions of years. Around a white-dwarf Sun it may stay in orbit, though disturbances from passing stars could destabilize it. Eris is less certain. If it stays bound, the orbit expands. Because it is so distant, the orbit may not stay stable, and a rare disturbance could send it out of the solar system. The notes call that ejection highly unlikely, and still possible.

Pluto

Orbit widens. Stays icy for billions of years. May remain after the Sun is a white dwarf. Passing stars could disturb it.

Ceres

A harsher thermal future because it is closer. Surface ice and near-surface water leave. The orbit still expands.

Eris

Orbit widens if it stays bound. Stability is the weak point. Ejection is possible and, in the notes, highly unlikely.

Evidence. Solar mass loss weakens the pull and pushes the orbits out. That is the shared future in the notes. Ceres is the one whose ice and near-surface water are lost to the extra heat.

Still open. Pluto “may remain.” Eris’s future is called uncertain. Ejection is “highly unlikely, but still possible.” The direction that is shared, and more firmly stated, is that the orbits expand.

Sources

Lucas Noury and Andrew Davis, Pluto, Ceres, and Eris. Images they credit: New Horizons views of Pluto and Charon, NASA / JHUAPL / SwRI, and a Dawn view of Ceres, NASA / JPL-Caltech. Eris is an illustration in their notes. The atmosphere measurement they cite is the 9 June 1988 stellar occultation.